Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Jullian said:

The discussion,”Wasn’t” Central could trash other teams by 50. The discussion was the Chaminade vs Central game & fans of the 305. Reread please……

Miami central will beat your team, his team, my team, and her team by 50 points 


Posted
19 minutes ago, VeniceIndianFan said:

Anyone outside the top 30 in Florida would lose by 35+ to Chaminade or Central 

I agree, not sure how much they lose by, but I'm sure a lot of Florida teams not in the top 30 would get running clocked by either Miami or Chaminade. Good chance if your not top 250 in the nation you're gonna get beat bad. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Cat_Scratch said:

I agree, not sure how much they lose by, but I'm sure a lot of Florida teams not in the top 30 would get running clocked by either Miami or Chaminade. Good chance if your not top 250 in the nation you're gonna get beat bad. 

Hope to see Cocoa play Venice and STA (at home!) again, next year. Venice vs Cocoa on ESPN would be a great money-maker for both schools! 

Posted
8 hours ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

It’s not the fact of the championship not being enough. But when you’re disrespectful & cocky with it & talking nothing but cash sh*t as if you’re unbeatable, when you do take those “L’s” you can’t feel a way when you get that same treatment you dish out when you’re on the winning end. 
 

dade county schools are known historically for disrespecting everyone. I’ve seen it with my own eyes. Even played against it. I guarantee you had central won last night it would’ve been a bunch of insane disrespect. 
 

fu*k broward county etc etc. 

why would we say that when everybody who matter on they team from dade? thats crazy my boy

Posted
46 minutes ago, DarterBlue2 said:

They would hold their own. But I feel this STA team loses to both Central and Chaminade. But we will never know. 

Where I’m confused at is when did this thread become a debate about what Florida schools would be able to beat or stay close to chaminade or central ? 
 

the greatness of these two were never in question. Nor was the fact of them being able to beat 95% of this state wasn’t in question either. 
 

this thread was about MIAMI CENTRAL. B4 this season started they roared & beat  their chest & said were the KINGS OF FLORIDA & now we’re gonna prove that we’re the BEST in the nation. 
 

Not only did they lose their OOS test, they now have also lost in state & now hoist a (1-2) record. 
 

are they still great ? YES , will they most likely run through 2M again & 5 Pete ? YES , with all that said central got humbled & that’s okay. 

Posted
1 minute ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

Where am I’m confused at is when did this thread became a debate about what Florida schools would be able to beat or stay close to chaminade or central ? 
 

the greatness of these two were never in question. Nor was the fact of them being able to beat 95% of this state wasn’t in question either. 
 

this thread was about MIAMI CENTRAL. B4 this season started they roared, bested their chest & said were the KINGS OF FLORIDA & now we’re gonna prove we’re the BEST in the nation. 
 

Not only did they lose their OOS test, now they have also lost in state & now hoist a (1-2) record. 
 

ate they still great ? YES , will they most likely run through 2M again & 5 Pete ? YES , with all that said central got humbled & that’s okay. 

I'll stay on topic next time

Posted
16 hours ago, THIS_IS_DILLARD said:

Where I’m confused at is when did this thread become a debate about what Florida schools would be able to beat or stay close to chaminade or central ? 
 

the greatness of these two were never in question. Nor was the fact of them being able to beat 95% of this state wasn’t in question either. 
 

this thread was about MIAMI CENTRAL. B4 this season started they roared & beat  their chest & said were the KINGS OF FLORIDA & now we’re gonna prove that we’re the BEST in the nation. 
 

Not only did they lose their OOS test, they now have also lost in state & now hoist a (1-2) record. 
 

are they still great ? YES , will they most likely run through 2M again & 5 Pete ? YES , with all that said central got humbled & that’s okay. 

FAM YOU WAS THE MAIN ONE HYPING THEM PPL! I think Im da only one who said the BTW & NORLAND would be just as good, they took a L to a good team & they still have good teams to go. Game could’ve went either way & you still got a fairly young team at central. They gon be ight

Posted
Just now, cribboy305 said:

FAM YOU WAS THE MAIN ONE HYPING THEM PPL! I think Im da only one who said the BTW & NORLAND would be just as good, they took a L to a good team & they still have good teams to go. Game could’ve went either way & you still got a fairly young team at central. They gon be ight

Of course they’re gonna be alright. But I think you got me confused with @VeniceIndianFan because I was the main one saying from day 1 that adding all them transfers don’t mean nothing on paper if it don’t equate to wins on the field.

when they had that subpar effort vs vanguard I was the main one saying central better get it together b4 week 1 or they would lose that game (which they did).

When ever I said something it was “I was hating/throwing shade”

when I was the first one to say with everything central got on paper if they Take any L’s this season it would be an embarrassment. 

Posted

I know i'm a little late but lets not act like chaminade did not get the benefit of a early whistle because floyd bounced off them boys and was headed to the houseand i respect central coach for not bringing that up and trying to taint a good game but the refs were to quick on that play they gave chaminade recievers more time to fight for yards just saying that play right there

Posted
10 hours ago, Rocket Fan said:

I know i'm a little late but lets not act like chaminade did not get the benefit of a early whistle because floyd bounced off them boys and was headed to the houseand i respect central coach for not bringing that up and trying to taint a good game but the refs were to quick on that play they gave chaminade recievers more time to fight for yards just saying that play right there

What are you talking about? 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...



  • Posts

    • Nolebull, You are making a good argument for what the rule ought to be or why the rule ought to be changed.   I'm telling you what the rule is.  Interestingly, I witnessed first hand the FHSAA deal with a case that was very similar to the (presumably, hypothetical) one you just described.  A family provided a kid with a bed for the night because that kid had an unfortunate family situation that would have left him homeless for the night had a teammate's family not stepped up and given him a place to stay for the night.  Yep, you got it, impermissible benefit.  Coach and school penalized.  The difficulty is coming up with rules that can't be taken advantage of.  Where do you draw the line?   If paying for an Uber is OK, why can't you just buy the kid a car instead?  More convenient for all parties.  If you can buy a kid a meal, why can't you take his family grocery shopping and let them stock up?  Or, better yet, just give then a gift card and let them spend the money as they please.  What do you do when one school offers up a $1,000 gift card, but another school is willing to give the kid a $2,000 gift card?  Do we really want to turn high school sports into professional sports?
    • Some kids NEED to transfer to get in the best position to change the trajectory of their entire life. Could literally save their life. Difference between going to college and being stuck in your neighborhood getting lost to streets.    And I can only speak for myself, but I’m more interested in a at-risk kid changing his situation for the better in hopes of saving his life than your favorite high school team losing a game because he transferred from your favorite school. 
    • I wouldn’t be so critical of the FHSAA if they didn’t lie and say they give 2 craps about student athletes. I wish people would just be honest. But I guess if they were honest, it would mess up their hustle. 
    • Wait are you saying there is a rule that bars an adult mentor who coaches young men a sport from helping a struggling student athlete and his family with transportation? Whoa that’s next level crazy.    “Hey coach I’m on the side of the road and almost got hit. I’m miles from school and it’s 110 degrees out. Can you get me a ride?” ”Sorry. Some turds 6 hours away in Gainesville said I can’t. Hope you don’t get hit or pass out.” 
    • Say what you want, justify it however you want, wish the rules weren't what they are, but there is no question that a coach or other school representative paying for Uber rides for kids playing sports is a violation of the existing FHSAA rules.  Period.  And Teddy Bridgewater may be or have been an elite athlete, may be or become an excellent high school football coach, and/or may have his heart in the right place, but tweeting out a message to the world that you have done something that undoubtedly constitutes a violation of the rules is just plain stupid. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...